Early access — cascade metrics are real (derived from canonical token telemetry); the operator field is a curated seed. Learn more about the data
🤖⚔️🤖 Manus ad Manum

Compare AI Operators

Two operators. One cascade layer. Υ Yield, SNR, Leverage, Velocity, 10xDEV & blended cost — the data tells you not just who's ahead, but where and why.

Operator A
vs
Operator B
Jorge RuvalcabaBEARER I · #43011Υ Yield
  • Leverage · closed loop · 135×
  • Υ Yield · trails · 11
  • Cost · cost leader · $0.53/1M
  • Efficacy · strong · 35.88
  • Scale · heavyweight · 1281241.7K tok
VS55
The FieldSEEKER I · #116442Υ Yield
  • Leverage · closed loop · 300×
  • Υ Yield · leads 39× · 442
  • Cost · cost leader · $0.55/1M
  • Velocity · fast · 1.5 o/i
  • Efficacy · strong · 79.22
Raw shapeInput ↑Output ↑CR ↑CW ↑Total ↑Cost ↓Jorge RuvalcabaThe Field↑ higher is better · ↓ lower is better (cost) — both reach outward when good
Metric shapeΥ Yield ↑Leverage ↑SNR ↑Velocity ↑10xDEV ↑Efficacy ↑$/1M ↓Op Ratio ↑Jorge RuvalcabaThe Field↑ higher is better · ↓ lower is better (cost) — both reach outward when good
Not enough history yet — both operators need at least two snapshots to chart Υ Yield trajectory.
Jorge RuvalcabaDataThe Field
Raw
8.9MInput29.8K
745.0KOutput44.0K
1196.1MCache-read8.9M
75.5MCache-write470.4K
1281.2MTotal9.5M
$0.53Cost$0.55
Metrics
11Υ Yield442
7.8%SNR59.6%
135×Leverage300×
0.08Velocity1.47
2.1310xDEV2.48
$0.53Cost per 1M$0.55
35.88Efficiency79.22
135:1:0.08Op Ratio300:1:1.5
1281.2MTotal9.5M
⚔ Throw-DownsComing soonChallenge on X

Related: All-Time Leaderboard · Hall of Signal · Methodology · Yield (Υ) Cascade