Early access — cascade metrics are real (derived from canonical token telemetry); the operator field is a curated seed. Learn more about the data
🤖⚔️🤖 Throw Down

Manus ad Manum

Two operators. One cascade layer. Υ Yield, SNR, Leverage, Velocity, 10xDEV & blended cost — the data tells you not just who's ahead, but where and why.

Operator A
vs
Operator B
Jun KangPOWER I · #136302Υ Yield◆ Leads 73
  • Leverage · closed loop · 325×
  • Υ Yield · trails · 302
  • Cost · cost leader · $0.45/1M
  • Efficacy · strong · 83.98
  • Scale · heavyweight · 54083214.4K tok
VS73
The FieldSEEKER I · #116442Υ Yield
  • Leverage · closed loop · 300×
  • Υ Yield · leads 1.5× · 442
  • Cost · cost leader · $0.55/1M
  • Velocity · fast · 1.5 o/i
  • Efficacy · strong · 79.22
Raw shapeInput ↑Output ↑CR ↑CW ↑Total ↑Cost ↓Jun KangThe Field↑ higher is better · ↓ lower is better (cost) — both reach outward when good
Metric shapeΥ Yield ↑Leverage ↑SNR ↑Velocity ↑10xDEV ↑Efficacy ↑$/1M ↓Op Ratio ↑Jun KangThe Field↑ higher is better · ↓ lower is better (cost) — both reach outward when good
Not enough history yet — both operators need at least two snapshots to chart Υ Yield trajectory.
Jun KangDataThe Field
Raw
160.5MInput29.8K
148.9MOutput44.0K
52244.4MCache-read8.9M
1529.4MCache-write470.4K
54083.2MTotal9.5M
$0.45Cost$0.55
Metrics
302Υ Yield442
48.1%SNR59.6%
325×Leverage300×
0.93Velocity1.47
2.5110xDEV2.48
$0.45Cost per 1M$0.55
83.98Efficiency79.22
325:1:0.93Op Ratio300:1:1.5
54083.2MTotal9.5M
⚔ Throw-DownsComing soonChallenge on X