Early access — cascade metrics are real (derived from canonical token telemetry); the operator field is a curated seed. Learn more about the data
🤖⚔️🤖 Manus ad Manum

Compare AI Operators

Two operators. One cascade layer. Υ Yield, SNR, Leverage, Velocity, 10xDEV & blended cost — the data tells you not just who's ahead, but where and why.

Operator A
vs
Operator B
Larkin Williams-CaponeSEEKER III · #131367Υ Yield
  • Leverage · closed loop · 661×
  • Υ Yield · trails · 367
  • Cost · cost leader · $0.51/1M
  • Efficacy · strong · 175.10
  • Scale · heavyweight · 3643695.5K tok
VS37
The FieldSEEKER I · #113461Υ Yield◆ Leads 73
  • Leverage · closed loop · 350×
  • Υ Yield · leads 1.3× · 461
  • Cost · cost leader · $0.48/1M
  • Velocity · fast · 1.3 o/i
  • Efficacy · strong · 90.98
Raw shapeInput ↑Output ↑CR ↑CW ↑Total ↑Cost ↓Larkin Williams-CaponeThe Field↑ higher is better · ↓ lower is better (cost) — both reach outward when good
Metric shapeΥ Yield ↑Leverage ↑SNR ↑Velocity ↑10xDEV ↑Efficacy ↑$/1M ↓Op Ratio ↑Larkin Williams-CaponeThe Field↑ higher is better · ↓ lower is better (cost) — both reach outward when good
Not enough history yet — both operators need at least two snapshots to chart Υ Yield trajectory.
Larkin Williams-CaponeDataThe Field
Raw
5.2MInput13.6M
2.9MOutput17.9M
3433.4MCache-read4763.9M
202.2MCache-write174.9M
3643.7MTotal4970.4M
$0.51Cost$0.48
Metrics
367Υ Yield461
35.7%SNR56.8%
661×Leverage350×
0.55Velocity1.32
2.8210xDEV2.54
$0.51Cost per 1M$0.48
175.10Efficiency90.98
661:1:0.55Op Ratio350:1:1.3
3643.7MTotal4970.4M
⚔ Throw-DownsComing soonChallenge on X

Related: All-Time Leaderboard · Hall of Signal · Methodology · Yield (Υ) Cascade