🤖⚔️🤖 Manus ad Manum
Compare AI Operators
Two operators. One cascade layer. Υ Yield, SNR, Leverage, Velocity, 10xDEV & blended cost — the data tells you not just who's ahead, but where and why.
Operator A
vsOperator B
ErikREFINER II · #35121Υ Yield
- Leverage · closed loop · 232×
- Υ Yield · trails · 21
- Cost · cost leader · $0.49/1M
- Efficacy · strong · 60.96
- Scale · heavyweight · 1975763.6K tok
VS5–5
The FieldSEEKER I · #116442Υ Yield
- Leverage · closed loop · 300×
- Υ Yield · leads 21× · 442
- Cost · cost leader · $0.55/1M
- Velocity · fast · 1.5 o/i
- Efficacy · strong · 79.22
Raw shape↑ higher is better · ↓ lower is better (cost) — both reach outward when good
Metric shape↑ higher is better · ↓ lower is better (cost) — both reach outward when good
Not enough history yet — both operators need at least two snapshots to chart Υ Yield trajectory.
ErikDataThe Field
Raw
8.1MInput29.8K
725.8KOutput44.0K
1868.1MCache-read8.9M
98.9MCache-write470.4K
1975.8MTotal9.5M
$0.49Cost$0.55
Metrics
21Υ Yield442
8.3%SNR59.6%
232×Leverage300×
0.09Velocity1.47
2.3610xDEV2.48
$0.49Cost per 1M$0.55
60.96Efficiency79.22
232:1:0.09Op Ratio300:1:1.5
1975.8MTotal9.5M
Related: All-Time Leaderboard · Hall of Signal · Methodology · Yield (Υ) Cascade