Early access — cascade metrics are real (derived from canonical token telemetry); the operator field is a curated seed. Learn more about the data
🤖⚔️🤖 Manus ad Manum

Compare AI Operators

Two operators. One cascade layer. Υ Yield, SNR, Leverage, Velocity, 10xDEV & blended cost — the data tells you not just who's ahead, but where and why.

Operator A
vs
Operator B
PKTonnamREFINER I · #4927Υ Yield
  • Υ Yield · trails · 7
  • Cost · cost leader · $0.62/1M
  • Leverage · deep reuse · 35×
  • Efficacy · strong · 9.19
  • Scale · heavyweight · 2584726.8K tok
VS46
The FieldSEEKER I · #116442Υ Yield◆ Leads 64
  • Leverage · closed loop · 300×
  • Υ Yield · leads 60× · 442
  • Cost · cost leader · $0.55/1M
  • Velocity · fast · 1.5 o/i
  • Efficacy · strong · 79.22
Raw shapeInput ↑Output ↑CR ↑CW ↑Total ↑Cost ↓PKTonnamThe Field↑ higher is better · ↓ lower is better (cost) — both reach outward when good
Metric shapeΥ Yield ↑Leverage ↑SNR ↑Velocity ↑10xDEV ↑Efficacy ↑$/1M ↓Op Ratio ↑PKTonnamThe Field↑ higher is better · ↓ lower is better (cost) — both reach outward when good
Not enough history yet — both operators need at least two snapshots to chart Υ Yield trajectory.
PKTonnamDataThe Field
Raw
68.5MInput29.8K
14.6MOutput44.0K
2377.3MCache-read8.9M
124.4MCache-write470.4K
2584.7MTotal9.5M
$0.62Cost$0.55
Metrics
7Υ Yield442
17.6%SNR59.6%
35×Leverage300×
0.21Velocity1.47
1.5410xDEV2.48
$0.62Cost per 1M$0.55
9.19Efficiency79.22
35:1:0.21Op Ratio300:1:1.5
2584.7MTotal9.5M
⚔ Throw-DownsComing soonChallenge on X

Related: All-Time Leaderboard · Hall of Signal · Methodology · Yield (Υ) Cascade