One Tool Isn't the Whole Field.
clauderank ranks Claude Code users. SigRank ranks AI operators across every platform. One tool is not the whole field.
The short version: clauderank
clauderank is a ranking tool for Claude Code users. It ranks users by their Claude Code usage. It does its job: it ranks the Claude Code crowd. But most operators don't use just one tool. They drive Claude Code for some tasks, Cursor for others, Copilot for others. A Claude Code-only ranking misses everyone who isn't on Claude Code and can't compare operators across platforms.
SigRank is platform-neutral. It reads telemetry from Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini, and 15+ other tools, scores the cascade yield, and ranks every operator on the same scale. The headline metric, Υ Yield = cache_read × output / input², rewards the operator who reuses cached context efficiently — no matter which tool they drove. clauderank ranks the Claude Code crowd; SigRank ranks the whole field.
Feature comparison
| Feature | clauderank | SigRank |
|---|---|---|
| What it ranks | Claude Code users | AI operators across every platform |
| Platform coverage | Claude Code only | Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini, 15+ platforms |
| Cascade efficiency score (Υ Yield) | No | Yes |
| Compression ratio + SNR + Leverage + Velocity | No (usage ranking) | Yes (derived metrics) |
| Class tier (IGNITER to ARCH+) | No | Yes |
| Operator profiles + head-to-head compare | Partial (rank profiles) | Yes |
| MCP server for AI-agent integration | No | Yes |
| ed25519-signed snapshot submission | No | Yes |
| Bundled tools (tokscale, token-dashboard) | No | Yes |
| Privacy-preserving (token counts only) | Yes | Yes |
Why one tool isn't the whole field
clauderank answers "who ranks highest on Claude Code?" That's a useful question, but it's not the whole question. Most operators don't use just one tool. They drive Claude Code for some tasks, Cursor for others, Copilot for others. A Claude Code-only ranking can't compare an operator who uses Cursor 80% of the time with one who uses Claude Code 80% of the time. It can't see the operator who is most efficient across all platforms.
SigRank's headline metric, Υ = cache_read × output / input², is platform-neutral. It reads the same four token pillars from every supported tool and scores the cascade yield on the same scale. clauderank ranks the Claude Code crowd; SigRank ranks the whole field.
The four token pillars (both tools read these from Claude Code)
- Input: tokens you send to the model
- Output: tokens the model generates back
- Cache-read: cached tokens reused from prior context
- Cache-write: new tokens written to cache for future reuse
From Claude Code to the whole field
If you already run clauderank, you have the Claude Code ranking. SigRank reads the same telemetry and adds the cross-platform scoring layer Claude Code-only rankings never had:
npm install -g sigrank sigrank enroll # create your operator identity sigrank submit # reads logs, scores, signs, publishes
Prefer to inspect before you submit? Run sigrank me --dry-run to see your scored payload locally, or paste your token counts into the /score calculator to compute your Υ Yield, class tier, and compression ratio instantly, no account, no submission, just the numbers.
Frequently asked questions
- Is SigRank a clauderank alternative?
- They overlap on having a ranking but diverge on scope and scoring. clauderank ranks Claude Code users — who used Claude Code the most or best. SigRank ranks AI operators across every platform by cascade yield. If you want a Claude Code-only ranking, clauderank is that. If you want to know who is the best AI operator across all platforms, SigRank answers that. You can run both — they read the same Claude Code logs.
- Why is Claude Code-only ranking not enough?
- Most operators don't use just one tool. They drive Claude Code for some tasks, Cursor for others, Copilot for others. A Claude Code-only ranking misses everyone who isn't on Claude Code and can't compare operators across platforms. SigRank is platform-neutral: it reads telemetry from Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini, and 15+ other tools, scores the cascade yield, and ranks every operator on the same scale. One tool is not the whole field.
- What does clauderank not measure that SigRank does?
- clauderank reports Claude Code user rankings. SigRank reads the same four token pillars and derives the cascade architecture: Υ Yield (is signal compounding or burning?), compression ratio (output per input), SNR (signal density), Leverage (how much cached context amplifies your input), and Velocity (tokens per unit time). clauderank tells you who ranks highest on Claude Code; SigRank tells you who is the most efficient operator across every platform.
- Can I use both clauderank and SigRank?
- Yes. clauderank gives you the Claude Code ranking. SigRank gives you the cross-platform operator ranking. Run `sigrank submit` to publish your cascade score to the SigRank leaderboard, and keep clauderank for the Claude Code crowd. The two are complementary, not mutually exclusive. The same local logs feed both.
- Which is better for finding the best AI operator?
- SigRank. clauderank can only rank operators who use Claude Code. SigRank ranks operators across Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini, and 15+ other platforms on the same yield scale. If you want to know who is the best AI operator — not just the best Claude Code user — you need a platform-neutral ranking. clauderank is Claude Code only; SigRank is the whole field.
Ready to see your yield?
Keep your Claude Code ranking for the clauderank crowd. Add the cross-platform operator ranking that Claude Code-only rankings cannot provide. Install SigRank and submit your first signed snapshot in under a minute.
Related: ccusage Alternatives · Yield Calculator · The Local Agent (MCP)